![retroshare vs piratebox retroshare vs piratebox](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/froAAOSwKvRfS~QQ/s-l400.jpg)
Once the tunnel is running, in “Local tunnels”, we could see that a base32 address appears and that will be the address we use for our hidden node.
Retroshare vs piratebox software#
Same as in the previous case, the port by default in both software is the same, 44321, if you don’t want to change it just leave it like that. Tunnel Wizard -> Server Tunnel -> Standard -> enter a name -> enter the address and port your RS is using (see Local Address above) -> check ‘Auto Start’ -> finish! This is the tunnel that we will use to access the I2P network and the other nodes, now we will go with the input tunnel. You can change the port if you want but by default both I2P and Retroshare use port 4447. Tunnel Wizard -> Client Tunnel -> SOCKS 4/4a/5 -> enter a name -> leave ‘Outproxies’ empty -> enter port (memorize!) -> check ‘Auto Start’ -> finish! We will start configuring the tunnels we are gonna need in I2P so Retroshare has everything it needs when we configure our hidden node.įor this we will go to the router section “Local tunnels”, if you have I2P in local it should be: Īs the steps, even somehow hidden, are quite well explained in Retroshare:
![retroshare vs piratebox retroshare vs piratebox](https://28chan.org/board/pol/src/1614795335555-0.jpg)
Once we have I2P running and our Profile created in Retroshare let’s get started.
Retroshare vs piratebox install#
If you try to install it using the repositories you will see and error about a missing dependency, this has already been reported too and they are working on it.
Retroshare vs piratebox how to#
Then idea is to have several services (messenger, chat, file exchange, etc) that doesn’t depend on central servers (our information goes directly from one node to the other) and that they don’t need our public IP (use of I2P addresses).įortunately there is a quite some information about how to install both this softwares so I’m gonna skip that step, I only have to say that if you use Debian 8 I recommend you install Retroshare using the packet they have in github or, if you want co compile it, check a ticket I open about the dependencies as the ones in the wiki are outdated. I couldn’t test this too much due to the lack of nodes inside and outside of this networks but, with a small network of two nodes, my normal client wasn’t able to ready the hidden one and vice versa. I should explain that if we run a node this way the normal nodes will be only able to reach our node if they have configured an exit towards this networks. In version 0.6 Retroshare includes the possibility to run hidden nodes with integration for TOR and I2P, thanks to this instead of using our IP we can use onion or i2p addresses. This was the major reason why I stopped using Retroshare, even being based in a trust model I wasn’t convinced with the idea of my IP being disclosed like that. The major problem with this method is that our public IP is included in that key as Retroshare needs it to know where is our node and how to reach it. Doesn’t matter if you add somebody, if the other person doesn’t add you the connection will not happen. To be able to connect two nodes a key exchange must be done, like in GPG, with this both users allow the nodes to connect to each other. What makes Retroshare so interesting is its decentralized model where there are no servers to connect to obtain the different services, in this case, this services work in a secure way between different nodes connected between them. I2P provides the first layer of anonymity helping us hide our IP and Retroshare gives us several decentralized services. At the contrary, we are gonna have services that we already use daily but they are probably gonna me slower and have more downtime. The purpose of this post is, precisely, try to help them be more known.īut, What are the advantages of messing with this?Īt functional level? None. Neither of them is as well-known as Tor or other alternatives that we have seen even in the TV, sadly this means that the amount of help in the internet is quite limited. Today I bring you a post that combines two softwares that I have liked for a long time but that I didn’t have a lot of chances to really use them without being simple tests. It’s been a long time since I published something and it’s because I have been busy changing the blog to another server and testing several things like OSSEC that I will tell you about in future post. WARNING: This post is based in my personal opinion, I’m not trying to sell anything, and I’m not related to neither of the projects in any way.